Skip to main content

"Simple tokens of death": Salt by David Harsent - review

If poems are like other people’s photographs in which we recognise ourselves, David Harsent’s writing catches us at our most vulnerable, vicious and unnervingly visceral. Reading through his back catalogue gives you the measure of his oeuvre: A Violent Country, After Dark, Dreams of the Dead, Mr Punch, Night. Stalking through an often nightmarish territory of half-apprehended horror and bleakness, the narrators of his poems survey human fear and frailty against the backdrop of an elemental, unforgiving world. Like a scene from a Hitchcockian movie, the worst always seems to be held just out of shot, all the more present for its apparent absence. Redemption and absolution are rarely on offer. Harsent may have a beautiful technical facility for language, its measure, weight and texture, but the ends to which it is put are as black as a darkroom negative.

Salt is Harsent’s first collection since Fire Songs, winner of the 2014 TS Eliot prize. Its poems form a strange sequence of sorts, though their author is resistant to such definitions: “the poems belong to each other”, we are told in a prefatory note, “by way of certain images and words that form a ricochet of echoes”. Fragmentary, fleeting and impressionistic, the poems in Salt are rarely longer than five lines, issued from an anonymous speaker who gives next to nothing away, just as the poems so often explore the apparent next to nothing – a moment, seemingly insignificant, is mined for its sudden significance, as revelation, brief history or omen. Take the following piece, quoted here in full:

He untangled the thing that had snagged in her hair, his hand
through a spectrum, spectral, blurring, a rail of fingers,
to lift the thing in her hair. It would rain that day, cloud low
to the hills, morning as nightfall, her window open to that.

While Salt seems to mark a stylistic departure for Harsent – he has surely written nothing so sparing and eerily suspended – this thematic terrain is all too familiar. Delving into harm, hurt and danger, relaying our little human urges, grievances and tragedies: loss and pain skirt the edges of almost every poem, with the precise, unblinking eye of their shadowy narrator. “She turned towards him, then she turned her back”; “She thought that loss might be measured best in poundage”; “The door was open and the room was dark”; “Hanging rain on a slow wind, open your mouth, give up”: these are just a handful of opening lines at which the book might fall open.

On the one hand, Harsent’s gift for conjuring an entire narrative in brief, gestural utterance pierces through the surface gleam of our petty but all too present human world with startling ease. But on the other, the poems’ seeming refusal to morally engage with the darkness and depravity they evoke will strike some readers as cynical, perhaps even irresponsible. “Sanctum sanctorum, bad breath, smegma, spillage and swill. / Diary of the suicidal child. Broken glass, graffiti, blood. / Ungovernable anger of the convert. Dogshit, the bloom on rot, / the locked book broken and burned”. More than one poem revels in this kind of grim list-making, an inverted litany in which we are challenged to hold our nerve as unblenchingly as the speaker. Is the poem’s suggestion that in such moments we might find our collective true measure? It is hard to tell.

Salt is a more probingly intelligent and involving read when it variously collapses the boundaries between what keeps us clothed, fed and comfortable, and that looming world of genuine pain, horror and destitution to which we could so easily fall. As someone living in the midst of apparent regeneration in a northern city, I see shiny and brash building work occur next to abject poverty and abandonment every day. Harsent’s depictions of homelessness are all the more affecting for being so shorn of sympathy and political anger. “Smell of the alley you might have to come to: piss and piss and piss. / Might have to live in, might have to make your home: / piss and piss and everything you own.” As “rough sleepers turn away”, the narrator matter-of-factly states how we “go by, go by”, a devastating observation as much as a scornful imperative.

Contemplating “the swipe of the butcher’s hand”, the speaker of one poem asks: “What is it you lack / that you should think like this?” The question echoes throughout the pages of Salt. Salt itself tends to surface here as purification, just as “we scatter salt / over slugs to have them writhe in cleanliness, / just as we lavish salt on the flogged man’s back”. But no amount can cure the sorry depths and ills to which these poems bear witness.

However we choose to see and feel and think (or not), Harsent’s poems suggest the unmentionable “stain that runs under everything” is here to stay. Sink to dreams, as the poems’ speaker sometimes does, and the nightmares resurface; turn away, and those “simple tokens of death” are still there, looming. As these poems flicker and shift, haunted by “the spectre of yourself” and a persistent feeling of resigned regret, the sense is of time’s inexorable demands, and the vast unhuman forces arrayed against us. Salt is Harsent’s most precisely bleak book to date, and makes for haunting reading.

review first published in The Guardian


Popular posts from this blog

Poetry in Motion

POETRY IN MOTION Why one Reds supporter is committing his love for Liverpool FC to verse Liverpool FC and poetry have a lot of previous – from John Toshack’s Gosh It’s Tosh collection in the late 70s, to the verse of Dave Kirby and Peter Etherington in the fanzine Red All Over the Land , to the lines written by poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy, a University of Liverpool graduate, in the aftermath of 2012’s Hillsborough findings. Now there’s Ben Wilkinson, Reds fan and book critic for The Guardian and the Times Literary Supplement , who’s compiling a series of poems commemorating the club’s legends. “Football is part of the fabric of life, and anything that’s important to people finds its way into poetry,” he says. “Wilfred Owen’s poem 'Disabled' describes a soldier who loses the use of his legs, meaning he can never play football again. Philip Larkin’s 'MCMXIV' compares boys queuing to join the army to fans outside Villa Park. These poems have stood th

Michael Hofmann - Changes

Changes Birds singing in the rain, in the dawn chorus, on power lines. Birds knocking on the lawn, and poor mistaken worms answering them ... They take no thought for the morrow, not like you in your new job. - It paid for my flowers, now already stricken in years. The stiff cornflowers bleach, their blue rinse grows out. The marigolds develop a stoop and go bald, orange clowns, straw polls, their petals coming out in fistfuls ... Hard to take you in your new professional pride - a salary, place of work, colleagues, corporate spirit - your new femme d'affaires haircut, hard as nails. Say I must be repressive, afraid of castration, loving the quest better than its fulfilment. - What became of you, bright sparrow, featherhead? poem by Michael Hofmann republished with permission of the author first published in The New Yorker from Acrimony (Faber, 1986) I've loved Hofmann's poetry since I first came across an old copy of what I still think hi

Louis MacNeice

‘World is crazier and more of it than we think, incorrigibly plural’. Even if you’re not that well-versed in modern British and Irish poetry, chances are you’ll still know ‘Snow’, or a line or two from the poem will seem naggingly familiar. While still in his twenties, Louis MacNeice wrote it in 1935, and since then, it’s been a favourite with readers, writers and editors, cropping up in every kind of poetry anthology. Weird, then, that MacNeice’s work has often been seen as a footnote to that of his illustrious pal W.H. Auden, when he’s so clearly a hugely original poet in his own right. And when, among more recent generations, the likes of Seamus Heaney, Michael Longley, Derek Mahon, Don Paterson and Conor O’Callaghan have all cited him as a major influence in their own writing. It’s not like ‘Snow’ was a one hit wonder, either. Despite some of the less exciting – and often lengthy – stuff he wrote in the early 50s, MacNeice only got better, perfecting his moving, atmospheric an